Peer Review of Teaching


OVERVIEW 

Berk, R.A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectivenessInternational Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17 (1), 48-62. Retrieved from

Chism, N. (2007). Why introducing or sustaining peer review of teaching is so hard, and what you can do about it. The Department Chair. 18(2), 6-8. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/dch.20017

Hoyt DP, Pallett WH. Appraising teaching effectiveness: beyond student ratings. Idea Paper No. 36. Manhattan: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, 1999:1–8. Retrieved from

 

MODELS AND GUIDEBOOKS FROM OTHER INSTITUTIONS 

Peer Review of Teaching: Guidelines and Suggestions Pertaining to the Rank and Status Process, Brigham Young University Faculty Center

Peer Review of Teaching at IPFW: A Handbook, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne

Peer Observation and Assessment of Teaching, University at Albany, SUNY

 

BOOKS

Arreola, R.A. (2007). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A guide to designing, building, and operating large-scale faculty evaluation systems (3rded.). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

Chism, N.V.N (2007). Peer review of teaching: A sourcebook (2nd ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

DeZure, D. (1999). Evaluating teaching through peer classroom observation. In P. Seldin and associates (eds.), Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker.

Seldin, P. (1999). Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker.

 



Page last modified October 31, 2017