The OEMC’s responsibilities will include, but are not limited to:

a) support ongoing training and professional development of online and hybrid teaching;

b) review microcredential proposals;

c) review current policies and practices regarding distance delivered education and microcredentials, and make recommendations for new policies and practices, where appropriate, in collaboration with appropriate committees (e.g., GC Curriculum and Program Review subcommittee, UCC, FSBC, etc.);

d) answer questions about delivery – online, hybrid, short-semester, “on-demand”, or “self-paced” delivery of content;

e) manage forms in the online curriculum system pertaining to microcredentials and distance education, as needed;

f) recommend curricular and pedagogical quality standards consistent with traditional course offerings;

g) recommend faculty and staff professional development standards for distance delivered education;

h) review and report on the quality of online/hybrid curricular and microcredential offerings as part of an end-of-year report

In partnership with the Office of the Provost, the committee ensures that all faculty teaching a distance delivered course has experience and/or training in online pedagogy.  Training is provided through the Pew Faculty Teaching and Learning Center in affiliation with the instructional designers in the office of Information Technology.  A full list of the OEMC's responsibilities can be found in the Shared Governance Faculty Handbook Policies. 

In 2018, the Online Education Council (OEC) was charged by the University Academic Senate to “Make recommendations for peer review of hybrid and online courses.” OEC has completed that work and developed a rubric that reflects best practices in online/hybrid education. The rubric is an amalgam of peer review research from a variety of sources, notably the Quality Matters Higher Education Rubric 2011 – 2013 Edition, the Penn State Peer Review Guide, and Chickering, A. & Gamson, Z. (1987). The rubric has been pilot tested twice by faculty with significant experience in online/hybrid education, and their feedback was instrumental in fine-tuning the rubric. OEC extends their appreciation to those faculty involved in the pilot tests.  Beginning in Fall 2019, this rubric must be used in peer review evaluations of any teaching in an online or hybrid format. In 2020, the name changed to Online Education and Microcredential Council (OEMC).

The committee encourages faculty to send students to the Online Information for Students site prior to the beginning of the semester, where students can self-assess his or her readiness to take a hybrid or online course.
Faculty Development OpportunitiesThe Pew Faculty Teaching and Learning Center offers training on how to engage students in online and hybrid courses, with levels ranging from beginning to advanced. Please visit the Faculty Resources for Online Education website for links to training options as well as other resources intended to support hybrid and online teaching and learning.

Badge Review and Approval ProcessTo be recognized as “university-approved” programs, all proposed badges require approval by the Online Education and Microcredential Council (OEMC) and the Office of the Provost. A digital badge, or badge, is a record of achievement that recognizes a student's completion of a coherent and meaningful academic experience. A badge includes anywhere from 0.5 to 15 academic credits, and may include additional noncredit criteria. Badges are digital credentials and are posted to the academic transcript. This is a five-step process.  

Step 1For all credit bearing and non-credit bearing badges, complete and submit the Badge Proposal Part 1 (of 2) in the SAIL system.

Step 2Upon review of the Badge Proposal Part 1 (of 2) form, the OEMC chairperson may schedule a meeting with associated personnel connected to the proposed badge, to discuss information in the Badge Proposal Part 1 (of 2). This meeting will take place during a regularly scheduled OEMC meeting, which currently occurs on Wednesdays from 1pm - 2pm. 

Step 3Once the Badge Proposal Part 1 (of 2) is approved by the OEMC, complete and submit the Badge Proposal Part 2. 

Step 4The OEMC chairperson may schedule a second meeting with associated personnel connected to the proposed badge to discuss information in the Badge Proposal Part 2. This meeting will take place during a regularly scheduled OEMC meeting which currently occurs on Wednesdays from 1pm - 2pm. The OEMC meets during the academic year only.

Please be aware that additional documentation will need to be submitted toward ensuring the badge can be implemented (i.e., catalog copy (if credit-bearing); information that helps the digital badge to be created and awarded through Acclaim, a third-party badge awarding platform; and other documentation as requested by the OEMC).

Step 5When the Badge Proposal Part 2 has been approved by the OEMC, proposers will work with specified personnel to finalize the badge (e.g., Provost’s office, Records, Budgeting, University Marketing, Adult and Continuing Studies, etc.). 

Coming soon! 

Coming soon!