2018 Status Achieved Mean scores on all 5 traits measured by the rubric exceeded the threshold.
2016 Status Achieved Mean scores on 3/5 traits measured by the rubric exceeded the threshold.
2016 Status Achieved Mean scores on all 5 traits measured by the rubric exceeded the threshold.
2018 Status Achieved Total scores for the Major Field Tests are reported on a scale of 220-300. The Average score of the EMBA students that took the test was 256.39, which was higher than the national average (247.9) and the performance of students at our competitive institutions (245.2). In terms of specific discipline areas, the students performed better than the competitive group in all areas of marketing, management, finance, accounting and strategic integration assessed by the test.
2016 Status Achieved Total scores for the Major Field Tests are reported on a scale of 220-300. The Average score of the EMBA students that took the test was 258, which was higher than the national average (248) and the performance of students at our competitive institutions (247.5). In terms of specific discipline areas, the students performed better than the competitive group in all areas of marketing, management, finance, accounting and strategic integration assessed by the test.
2018 Status Achieved Performance on each question is reported in terms of the percentage of students who answered the question correctly. Seidman business student's performance was higher than the national average. Our students answered a higher number of questions correctly in all areas of marketing, management, finance, accounting and strategic integration compared to the national average.
2016 Status Achieved Performance on each question is reported in terms of the percentage of students who answered the question correctly. 49.67% of Seidman business students answered the questions chosen correctly in comparison to 47.59% nationally.
2018 Status Achieved 100% of the students assessed performed at level 3
2018 Status Achieved Although, student performance on criterion 3 met the threshold performance, their ability to develop strategic options by integrating global and intercultural factors (criterion 4) was not addressed by the measure chosen for assessment.
2016 Status Achieved Mean scores on all traits measured by the rubric exceeded the threshold.
2016 Status Achieved Mean scores on traits measured by the rubric exceeded the threshold.
