ALLENDALE, Mich. - When it comes to estimating the intelligence of
various animal species, it may be as simple measuring overall brain
size. In fact, making corrections for a species' body size may be a
mistake. The findings were reported by researchers at Grand Valley State
University and the Anthropological Institute and Museum at the
University of Zürich, Switzerland. The study has now been published
online in the journal Brain, Behavior, and Evolution.
"It's long been known that species with larger body sizes generally
have larger brains," said Robert Deaner, assistant professor of
psychology at Grand Valley and the first author on the study.
"Scientists have generally assumed that this pattern occurs because
larger animals require larger nervous systems to coordinate their larger
bodies. But our results suggest a simpler reason: larger species are
typically smarter."
Deaner said the findings imply that a re-evaluation may be in order for
many previous studies that have compared brain size across different
animal species, including ancestral hominids.
The new results build on a paper by the same researchers, published in
the online journal Evolutionary Psychology, in July 2006, which showed
that some primate species consistently outperform others across a broad
range of cognitive tasks. That finding provided evidence for species
differences in intelligence or "domain-general cognition," in
the parlance of the field. This intelligence allows an animal to tackle
new and unpredictable situations. Domain-general cognitive ability
stands in contrast to domain-specific skills that are suited to
particular environment challenges, such as a bird remembering where it
cached food.
The new study compared how well eight different brain size measures
predicted the domain-general cognition variable generated in the earlier
study. To the researchers' surprise, overall brain size and overall
neocortex size proved to be good predictors, but the various measures
that controlled for body size did not. The results did not change even
when various statistical assumptions were altered.
Another unexpected finding was that the overall size of the whole brain
proved to be just as good a predictor of intelligence as was the overall
size of the neocortex. Scientists making cross-species comparisons have
often assumed that the neocortex would be more closely linked to
intelligence, since it is considered the "thinking part" of
the brain.
The findings raise the question of why larger animals should generally
be smarter. "That's now the $64,000 question," said Carel van
Schaik, Ph.D., a co-author on the study and the director of the
Anthropological Institute and Museum at the University of Zurich.
"We have some ideas. Larger animals may be better able to control
aspects of their environment and therefore have more to gain from being
more intelligent. But perhaps more important is that larger animals tend
to live longer, and can therefore benefit longer from being flexible and
adaptable, and perhaps may also need it more because the environment is
more likely to change during their lifetime. The challenge is to test
these ideas."
The authors warned that the study's primary implication-that body size
need not be considered when comparing brain size-shouldn't be taken too
literally. Deaner noted, "We believe that most of the relationship
between brain size and body size is due to larger animals being smarter,
but it's certainly possible-even likely-that some part of the
relationship is due to larger animals needing to maintain greater neural
traffic. Our point is that completely controlling for body size is
almost certainly a mistake."
"We didn't have data on enough species to address this question
conclusively," Deaner said. "But the human brain imaging data
indicate that some correction for 'neural traffic maintenance' is
probably needed. If it wasn't needed, then we would be stuck with some
real puzzles, such as the fact that there are no consistent sex
differences in IQ, yet men generally have larger brains. And, of course,
elephants and whales possess larger brains than we do, yet it's hard for
us to imagine that they are smarter than we are."
Other co-authors on the study were Karin Isler and Judith Burkart of the
Anthropological Institute and Museum at the University of Zürich.
For more information contact Robert Deaner at [email protected].
Bigger Is Smarter!
Subscribe
Sign up and receive the latest Grand Valley headlines delivered to your email inbox each morning.