Case: Glazier 1

Whether or not the supervisor made false statements that resulted in the defamation of the employee’s character? No. False statements were not made that resulted in the defamation of the employee’s character. This claim was denied.

Case: Taylor 1

1. Whether or not the employee was liable for contract breach, conversion, and statutory computer fraud? Yes, the employee was found liable in all three claims.

2. Whether or not employee’s claims of defamation and fraud and/or false promises are supported by evidence? No, the employee’s claims were not found to be supported by the evidence.

Case: Taylor 2

1. Whether or not the formerly employed attorney is liable for breach of contract with employer? Yes, the evidence showed that the attorney did indeed breach contract multiple times.

2. Whether or not the attorney is found liable on employer’s conversion claim? Yes, the attorney was found liable.

3. Whether or not the attorney was found liable for unauthorized computer access? Yes, the attorney was found liable for multiple instances of unauthorized computer access.

4. Whether or not the employer is guilty of defamation? No, the company was not found to be guilty of defamation of the attorney.

5) Whether or not the employer was liable for fraud and//or false promises? No, the employer was not found liable for fraud and//or false promises.



Page last modified November 6, 2015