November 27, 2013
Chart House Energy joins GVSU energy center's business incubator
November 26, 2013
Renewable energy storage device developed at GVSU business incubator
November 18, 2013
GV Connection: Students win big at business competition with solar tech
November 6, 2013
MAREC incubator business launches new solar technology
August 20, 2013
Naval Architect: Technology for off-shore wind Turbines isn't far off
- See all news items
Prop 3: More renewable power, but at what cost?
Date: October 18, 2012
By Jeff Alexander
October 18th, 2012
Story originally published on Bridge Michigan.
Consumers Energy President and CEO John Russell caused a stir last month when he marked the dedication of the utility’s first wind farm near Ludington by declaring that renewable energy is “clean, reliable and affordable for Michigan.”
Russell’s comments added fuel to the debate over Proposal 3, a proposed constitutional amendment that would require Michigan’s utilities to obtain 25 percent of the electricity they sell from renewable sources — which it identifies as wind, solar, biomass and hydropower — by 2025. The ballot initiative would limit utilities to rate increases of 1 percent annually to comply with the 25 percent renewable energy mandate.
Russell’s comments were curious because Consumers Energy is spending $600 million to build wind farms, while also spending $2.9 million to fight Proposal 3, which would require more renewable energy.
Proposal 3 supporters called Russell’s comments hypocritical.
Consumers Energy spokesman Jeff Holyfield said the Jackson-based utility supports renewable energy, but noted the Michigan Constitution directs the Legislature to handle energy policy. He said a 2008 law requiring Michigan to obtain 10 percent of its energy from renewables by 2015 should run its course before any changes are made.
“Michigan already has a renewable energy standard,” Holyfield said. “We think that standard is reasonable and affordable.” A recent state report said most utilities would meet the 2015 clean energy mandate.
The flap over Russell’s comments highlighted fundamental disagreements over how much of Michigan’s energy should come from renewable sources, how quickly the state should transition to cleaner sources of energy and who should make those decisions — voters directly or through the Legislature.
The 25 percent renewable energy standard contained in Proposal 3 would give Michigan one of the nation’s most aggressive clean energy mandates. Eleven other states have renewable energy mandates of 25 percent or higher.Find out more at bridgemi.com/2012/10/prop-3-more-renewable-power-but-at-what-cost/