Skip to main content

Peer Review of Teaching


OVERVIEW 

Berk, R.A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17 (1), 48-62. Retrieved from: http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE8.pdf

Chism, N. (2007). Why introducing or sustaining peer review of teaching is so hard, and what you can do about it. The Department Chair. 18(2), 6-8. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/dch.20017

Hoyt DP, Pallett WH. Appraising teaching effectiveness: beyond student ratings. Idea Paper No. 36. Manhattan: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, 1999:1–8. Retrieved from: http://ideaedu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/idea_paper_36.pdf

 

MODELS AND GUIDEBOOKS FROM OTHER INSTITUTIONS 

Peer Review of Teaching: Guidelines and Suggestions Pertaining to the Rank and Status Process, Brigham Young University Faculty Center, http://facultycenter.byu.edu/peer-review-teaching

Peer Review of Teaching at IPFW: A Handbook, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, http://www.ipfw.edu/dotAsset/dbc25a76-214a-4531-827f-5a17076ceb16.pdf

Peer Observation and Assessment of Teaching, University at Albany, SUNY, http://www.albany.edu/teachingandlearning/tlr/peer_obs/

 

BOOKS

Arreola, R.A. (2007). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A guide to designing, building, and operating large-scale faculty evaluation systems (3rded.). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

Chism, N.V.N (2007). Peer review of teaching: A sourcebook (2nd ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.

DeZure, D. (1999). Evaluating teaching through peer classroom observation. In P. Seldin and associates (eds.), Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker.

Seldin, P. (1999). Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker.