Save the Date:
Wednesday August 24
22nd Annual Conference on Teaching and Learning
Berk, R.A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17 (1), 48-62. Retrieved from: http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE8.pdf
Chism, N. (2007). Why introducing or sustaining peer review of teaching is so hard, and what you can do about it. The Department Chair. 18(2), 6-8. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/dch.20017
Hoyt DP, Pallett WH. Appraising teaching effectiveness: beyond student ratings. Idea Paper No. 36. Manhattan: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, 1999:1–8. Retrieved from: http://ideaedu.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/idea_paper_36.pdf
MODELS AND GUIDEBOOKS FROM OTHER INSTITUTIONS
Peer Review of Teaching: Guidelines and Suggestions Pertaining to the Rank and Status Process, Brigham Young University Faculty Center, http://facultycenter.byu.edu/peer-review-teaching
Peer Review of Teaching at IPFW: A Handbook, Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne, http://www.ipfw.edu/dotAsset/dbc25a76-214a-4531-827f-5a17076ceb16.pdf
Peer Observation and Assessment of Teaching, University at Albany, SUNY, http://www.albany.edu/teachingandlearning/tlr/peer_obs/
Arreola, R.A. (2007). Developing a comprehensive faculty evaluation system: A guide to designing, building, and operating large-scale faculty evaluation systems (3rded.). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
Chism, N.V.N (2007). Peer review of teaching: A sourcebook (2nd ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
DeZure, D. (1999). Evaluating teaching through peer classroom observation. In P. Seldin and associates (eds.), Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker.
Seldin, P. (1999). Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions. Bolton, MA: Anker.