Standard 1.7 Student Learning for Teacher Candidates
Return to Previous Page
Standard 1.0: Overview
Standard 1.1 Content Knowledge for Teacher Candidates
Standard 1.2 Content Knowledge for Other Professional School Personnel
Standard 1.3 Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teacher Candidates
Standard 1.4 Professional and Pedagogical Knowledge, Skills and Dispositions for Teacher Candidates
Standard 1.5 Professional Knowledge and Skills for Other School Personnel
Standard 1.6 Dispositions for All Candidates
Standard 1.7 Student Learning for Teacher Candidates
Standard 1.8 Student Learning for Other Professional School Persnnel
Standard 1: Recommendations/Summary
Exhibits and Displays for Standard 1

Assessments for Student Learning

Initial candidates develop basic knowledge and understanding of student learning in child psychology, educational psychology, and school learning courses. These courses emphasize how student differences affect learning, how to create and manage classroom environments, how belief and value systems affect evaluation, and how to design assessment components within lessons. Further proficiency occurs during the two semesters of field experience and seminars stressing methods and materials for meaningful learning. All lesson plans and direct instruction require provisions for student assessment.

Advanced candidates examine assessment and evaluation as they are shaped by historical, political and philosophical perspectives. In emphasis area courses, nearly every program contains at least one course directly related to student development and assessment. Candidates develop competence in constructing student assessments, evaluating instructional methods, and designing individual education programs to fit special needs:



See table below:

Initial and Advanced: Course Assessments for Student Learning
ED 430 ED 431 EDG 685 EDG 612 EDG 637 EDG 637 EDG 637 EDG 620 EDG 621 ED 631 ED 633 EDR 696 EDS 636 EDS 636 EDS 640 EDS 622
To link to syllabi and assessments of record, refer to individual courses above or Assessment System-Initial and/or Advanced for Teachers. Candidate work samples may be reviewed in the on-site exhibit room.

Initial standards most closely linked to student learning appear in all aspects of Domains 2 and also in 1-f. Advanced programs evaluate practicum candidates on student learning through all elements of NBPTS 1 and also through 3-d.

Over 90% of Initial candidates and over 95% of Advanced candidates achieved Proficient or Distinguished rankings in clinical practice. Again, however, follow-up percentages drop as the setting and points of comparison change:

Initial: Clinical Assessment, Follow-Up Studies (Student Learning)
For complete data on programs and sub-areas, refer to Clinical Assessment Data and Follow-Up Studies Data (Initial).


Advanced: Clinical Assessment and Follow-Up Studies (Student Learning)
For complete data on programs and sub-areas, refer to Clinical Assessment Data and Follow-Up Studies Data (Advanced-Teachers).


Back to top